User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; COS1.0; zh_CN; HTC 802t Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/537.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Browser/2.2.4 Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/537.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-cos.yaml
COS Webkit 537.17HTCOnemobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.09401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 4.0closeLinux Vodafonev1415mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 4.0WebKit GNU/Linux HTC802tsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeLinux HTC802tcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 537.17Linux HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.17COS HTCOnemobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:33 | by ThaDafinser