User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.2; xx; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20060127 Netscape/8.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-netscape.yaml
Netscape 8.1Windows 8Gecko 1.7.5desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.7Gecko 1.7 Desktop0.06401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 8.1closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 8desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Netscape Navigator 8.1closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 8.1closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Netscape 8.1closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 8.1Gecko 20060127Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape 8.1Gecko 1.7.5Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:32 | by ThaDafinser