User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Baiduspider-cpro; +http://www.baidu.com/search/spider.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Baiduspider-cpro Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesBaidu UnionBot/Crawler0.08701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesBaiduspiderclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBaidu SpiderSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesBaiduspider-cproclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesBaiduspiderCrawler0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Baidu Crawler Bot closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesBaiduspiderclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesBaiduspiderclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:32 | by ThaDafinser