User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; Edition Labs Camera and Pages; xx) Presto/2.9.220 Version/12.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Labs 12.00Linux Presto 2.9.220desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.00Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.00closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.00Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.022 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.0Presto 2.9.220Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Labs 12.00Presto 2.9.220Linux desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.04901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:32 | by ThaDafinser