User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Opera 12.17Windows 7Presto 2.12.388desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.17Presto 2.12Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.17closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.17Presto Windows 7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.17closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.17closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.17closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.17Presto 2.12.388Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.17Presto 2.12.388Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.17closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:31 | by ThaDafinser