User agent detail

ELinks/0.10.4-7-debian (textmode; Linux 2.6.14 i686; 110x48-2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-text.yaml
ELinks 0.10.4Linux desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
ELinks 0.10 Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ELinks 0.10.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Elinks 0.10.4closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Elinks 0.10Text-based GNU/Linux desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
ELinks 0.10closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ELinks 0.10.4-7-debiancloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
ELinks Linux 2.6.14closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
ELinks 0.10.4 Linux desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:31 | by ThaDafinser