User agent detail

Samsung-SCHU440 Infraware-Polaris/6.0 MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSCHU440 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Samsung-SCHU440 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Polaris 6.0closeJVM SamsungSCH U440mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungSCHU440smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 6.0close SamsungSCHU440closeclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Polaris 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.17802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Polaris 6.0 SamsungSCHU440 Infraware-Polarismobile:featureyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungSCH U440Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:31 | by ThaDafinser