User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.3; en-US; A808 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/10.1.0.527 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 10.1Android 4.4unknown LenovoA808Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.1U3 Android 4.4LenovoA808Mobile Phoneyesyes0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.3LenovoA808mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.1WebKit Android 4.4yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.1.0closeAndroid 4.4.3A808closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.1.0.527WebKit 534.30Android 4.4.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.1Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2A808mobile:smartyescloseclose0.11101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:31 | by ThaDafinser