User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Series60/3.0 NokiaE61-1/05w38.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaE61-1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.053 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.0closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.24802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.0Trident Symbian OS Series 60 3.0NokiaE61-1smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.0close NokiaE61-1closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MSIE close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.0Trident NokiaOS NokiaNokia E61-1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 3.0NokiaE61mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 3.0NokiaE61Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:29 | by ThaDafinser