User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux) AppleWebKit/538.11 HbbTV/1.1.1 (+DL+PVR; inverto; AIRSCREEN-MBN108; 1.0; 1.0;) CE-HTML/1.0 hdplusinteraktiv/1.0 (NETRANGEMMH;)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Webkit 538.11InvertoMBN 108television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 538.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close media-playercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux InvertoAIRSCREEN-MBN108tv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux invertoAIRSCREEN-MBN108closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 538.11Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 538.11 InvertoMBN 108televisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:29 | by ThaDafinser