User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; ; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) SecondLife/3.7.23.297296 (Second Life Release; default skin) Safari/533.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
yesSecond Live ClientBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesSecond Live ClientBot/Crawler0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 533.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 533.3closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.21302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Windows desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
SecondLife 3.7.23.297296WebKit 533.3Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SecondLife 3.7.23.297296Webkit 533.3Windows desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:29 | by ThaDafinser