User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050610 Firefox/1.0.4 (Debian package 1.0.4-3)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 1.0.4Debian Gecko 1.7.8desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 1.0Gecko 1.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.14101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 1.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 1.0.4closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.36904 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 1.0Gecko Debian desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 1.0.4closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 1.0.4closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 1.0.4closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.24402 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 1.0.4Gecko 20050610Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 1.0.4Gecko 1.7.8Debian desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 1.0.4closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 1.0.4closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:28 | by ThaDafinser