User agent detail

Opera/9.50 (Nintendo DSi; Opera/446; U; ja)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NintendoDSi Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.50Presto 2.0 Desktop0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.50closeNintendo desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.50Presto Nintendo Mobile DSiNintendoDSiconsoleyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.50close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.50close NintendoDSicloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 446close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nintendo DSi Browser Presto NintendoNintendo DSicloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.50 NintendoDSigaming:portableyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.50closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close NintendoDSiOther Mobileyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:28 | by ThaDafinser