User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Amiga; PowerPC AmigaOS 4.1; Odyssey Web Browser; rv:1.23) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) OWB/1.23 Safari/538.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-amigaos.yaml
Odyssey 1.23AmigaOS 4.1Webkit 538.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.17102 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 538.1closeAmiga OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Odyssey Web Browser 1.23WebKit AmigaOS 4.1desktop0.016 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeAmigaOS 4.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.08201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 538.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Odyssey 1.23Webkit 538.1AmigaOS 4.1desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:28 | by ThaDafinser