User agent detail

[FBAN/FB4A;FBAV/3.4;FBBV/258875;FBDM/{density=0.75,width=240,height=320};FBLC/tr_TR;FBCR/o2 - de;FBPN/com.facebook.katana;FBDV/LG-E400;FBSV/2.3.6;]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-767.php
Facebook App 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Facebook App WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.09501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Facebook close LGE400;FBSVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Facebook 3.4 LGE400smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Facebook 3.4close LGE400closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLGE400closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Facebook LGE400;FBSVmobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:25 | by ThaDafinser