User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:25.5) Gecko/20150607 Firefox/31.9 PaleMoon/25.5.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
PaleMoon 25.5Win10 10.025.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
PaleMoon 25.5Gecko 25.0Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.047 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 31.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Pale Moon 25.5.0closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Pale Moon 25.5Gecko Windows 10desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 31.9closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Pale Moon (Firefox Variant) 25.5.0closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Palemoon 25.5.0closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.08501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Pale Moon 25.5.0Gecko 20150607Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Pale Moon 25.5.0Gecko 25.5Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 31.9closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 31.9closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:25 | by ThaDafinser