User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; N; Windows NT 5.2; ru-RU) AppleWebKit/529 (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari/529.0) Lunascape/4.9.9.94
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Lunascape 4.9.9.94Windows Server 2003WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 529.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Lunascape 4.9.9.94closeWindows 5.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.20302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Lunascape 4.9WebKit Windows Server 2003desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Lunascape 4.9.9closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Lunascape 4.9.9.94closeWindows Server 2003 closecloseclosecloseclose0.07701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Lunascape 4.9.9.94WebKit 529Windows Windows NT 5.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Lunascape 4.9.9Webkit 529Windows Server 2003desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:24 | by ThaDafinser