User agent detail

Android 4.0.4;AppleWebKit/534.30;Build/IMM76D;T-970 Build/IMM76D
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AudiosonicT-970 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4T-970mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.4closeAndroid 4.0.4AudiosonicT-970closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 534.30Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.4T-970tabletyescloseclose0.09701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:24 | by ThaDafinser