User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SMART-TV; Linux; Tizen 2.2) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/2.2 Mobile Safari/538.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
Tizen 2.2Webkit 538.1SamsungSmart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 2.2closeLinux GenericSmartTVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.23502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 2.2WebKit Tizen 2.2SamsungSmart TVtvyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 2.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 2.2closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 2.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.18002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 538.1Smart TV closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 538.1Tizen 2.2SamsungSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 2.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:23 | by ThaDafinser