User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.57 Safari/537.36 OPR/18.0.1284.49
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 18.0OS X Mavericks 10.9Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 18.0Blink MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 18.0.1284.49closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 18.0.1284.49closeOS X 10.9.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 18.0Blink Mac 10.9desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 18.0.1284.49closeOS X 10.9.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 18.0.1284closeMac OS X 10.9.0closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.57closeOS X 10.9.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 18.0.1284.49WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 18.0Blink OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 18.0.1284.49closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 18.0.1284.49closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:23 | by ThaDafinser