User agent detail

Nokia201/2.0 (11.21) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; en-us; nokia201) UCBrowser8.3.0.154/70/355/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia201 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia201 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close NokiaNokia Asha 201mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.3 Symbian Nokia201smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.0close Nokia201closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.12701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.3.0.154 NokiaOS NokiaNokia 201closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.3Gecko Series40 NokiaAsha 201mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close NokiaNokia Asha 201Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.05701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:23 | by ThaDafinser