User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (QtEmbedded; U; Linux; C) AppleWebKit/533.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) ADAPI/1.0 (UUID:f9d65c88-e4cd-43b4-89eb-d0aeecbbbbbf; NAME:d0aeecbbbbbf) SMP864X-ADAPI/3.3.27 (MODEL:XMP-3250) Safari/533.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/signage/other.yaml
Adapi 1.0 Webkit 533.3IAdeaXMP-3250signage Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 533.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 533.3closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QT based browser WebKit 533.3Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Adapi 1.0Webkit 533.3 IAdeaXMP-3250signagecloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:22 | by ThaDafinser