User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DTV) NetFront/3.4 InettvBrowser/2.2 (08001F;DTV03VSFC;0002;0001)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Generic_InettvDTV03VSFC Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.4close GenericSmartTVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.4NetFront 0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close DTV03VSFCcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.36904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.4 SharpSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
InternetTVBrowser closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:22 | by ThaDafinser