User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dragon/36.7.0.8 Chrome/36.0.1985.97 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-705.php
Dragon 36.7Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dragon 36.7Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.12601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.97closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.97closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 36.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.97closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 36.0.1985closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.97closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.97WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Comodo Dragon 36.7Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.97closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 36.0.1985.97closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:22 | by ThaDafinser