User agent detail

HbbTV/1.1.1 (;;;;;) NETRANGEMMH sraf_tv_browser webkitMozilla/5.0 (Unknown; Linux mips) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/19.77.34.5 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Sraf TV Browser Webkit 537.36television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 19.77.34.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 19.77.34.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 19.77WebKit GNU/Linux SelevisionEMC1000itv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 19.77.34.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux HbbTVcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 19.77.34.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 19.77.34.5WebKit Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Seraphic Sraf Webkit 537.36 televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 19.77.34.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:22 | by ThaDafinser