User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; NetBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20121206 Firefox/17.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Firefox 17.0NetBSD Gecko 17.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 17.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 17.0closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 17.0Gecko NetBSD desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 17.0closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 17.0closeNetBSD closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 17.0closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 17.0Gecko 20121206a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 17.0Gecko 17.0NetBSD desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 17.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.04901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:22 | by ThaDafinser