User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-A947/A947UCJF3 Mozilla/5.0 (BREW 5.0.3; BP251/162; U; en; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061208 Firefox/2.0.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-A947 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 2.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 2.0.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 2.0Gecko Brew 5.0SamsungSGH-A947smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 2.0.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 2.0.0closeBREW 5.0.3SamsungSGH-A947closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 2.0.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 2.0.0Gecko 20061208 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Mobile 2.0.0Gecko 1.8.1Brew 5.0.3SamsungSGH-A947mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 2.0.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:21 | by ThaDafinser