User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Arch Linux i686; rv:2.0) Gecko/20110321 Firefox/4.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox 4.0Arch Linux Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 4.0Gecko 2.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 4.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 4.0Gecko Arch Linux desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 4.0closeArch Linux closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.043 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 4.0Gecko 20110321Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 4.0Gecko 2.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 4.0.1closeMac OS X 10.6Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:21 | by ThaDafinser