User agent detail

Nokia200/11.95
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series40.yaml
Series40 NokiaAsha 200mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia200 11.95closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries40 NokiaAsha 200mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia200smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 11.95closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia200closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 200closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series40 NokiaAsha 200mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close NokiaNokia Asha 200Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:21 | by ThaDafinser