User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (;;;) AppleWebKit/538.8 HbbTV/1.1.1 (+DL+PVR; selevision; Selevision EMC1000i; 1.0; 1.0;) CE-HTML/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Webkit 538.8SelevisionEMC1000itelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.14101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 538.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close media-playercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SelevisionEMC1000itv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close selevisionSelevision EMC1000icloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 538.8 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 538.8 SelevisionEMC1000itelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:19 | by ThaDafinser