User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Win32; WinHttp.WinHttpRequest.5)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
yesWinHttpBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesWinHttpBot/Crawler0.05601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
WinHTTP closeWindows software-librarycloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 95desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.0 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:18 | by ThaDafinser