User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; CT1030 Build/KTU84P) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.89 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 40.0.2214.89Android 4.4.4Blink CarrefourCT1030tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.05801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeAndroid 4.4.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.27903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 4.4CarrefourCT1030tabletyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 40.0.2214closeAndroid 4.4.4CelkonCT1030closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.07001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.89WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 40Blink Android 4.4.4CT1030tabletyescloseclose0.08601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Tabletyesyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:18 | by ThaDafinser