User agent detail

XPOR Android Application (12, xpor v2.0) - samsung SGH-T839 samsung - 00000000-3494-B2FA-58B6-CF423F771390
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
samsungSGH-T839 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
XPOR closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid SamsungSGH-T839 samsung - 00000000-3494-B2FA-58B6-CF423F771390mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android SamsungSGH-T839smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid samsungSGH-T839closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android SamsungT-Mobile Sidekickmobile:smartyescloseclose0.04801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.05601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:18 | by ThaDafinser