User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16) Gecko/20110322 Fedora/3.6.16-1.fc14 Firefox/3.6.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-102.php
Firefox 3.6Linux unknown1.9.2 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.09001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.16closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Fedora 3.6desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.16closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.16closeFedora 3.6.16closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.16closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.16Gecko 20110322Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.16Gecko 1.9.2Fedora 14desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.16closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:18 | by ThaDafinser