User agent detail

HTC_Touch_Diamond2_T5353
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCTouch_Diamond2_T5353 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HTC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows Mobile HTCTouch Diamond 2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
HTCTouch Diamond2 T5353smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCTouch_Diamond2_T5353closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows Mobile HTCTouch Diamond 2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile HTCT5353Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:16 | by ThaDafinser