User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; ar-AE) AppleWebKit/534.35 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.65 Safari/534.35 Puffin/3.10990IT
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-876.php
Puffin 3.0iOS unknownunknown AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Puffin 3.0WebKit iOS AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.11601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Puffin 3.10990closeiOS AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Puffin 3.10990WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Puffin 3.10990closeLinux AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Puffin 3.10990WebKit 534.35 iPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Puffin 3Webkit 534.35iOS iPadtabletyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:16 | by ThaDafinser