User agent detail

Opera/9.51 Beta (Microsoft Windows; PPC; Opera Mobi/1718; U; en)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Mobile 9.51Windows Mobile mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 9.5Presto 2.2WinMobile Mobile Phoneyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.51closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile closeWindows OperaMini 4mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.51Presto Windows desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.51closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 9.51closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.51 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.51 Windows Mobile mobile:smartyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.51closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile close OperaMini 4Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:16 | by ThaDafinser