User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (CrKey - 0.9.3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1573.2 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/google.yaml
Chrome Dev 30.0.1573.2 Blink 537.36GoogleChromecasttelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1573.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 30.0.1573.2close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 30.0Blink GoogleChromecasttv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1573.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 30.0.1573close closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 30.0.1573.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1573.2WebKit 537.36 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 30.0.1573.2Blink GoogleChromecasttelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1573.2closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:16 | by ThaDafinser