User agent detail

NCSA_Mosaic/2.0 (Windows 3.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NCSA closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NCSA Mosaic 2.0closeWindows 3.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NCSA Mosaic 2.0 Windows 3.1desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NCSA Mosaic 2.0closeWindows 3.1 closeclosecloseclose0.032 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NCSA_Mosaic 2.0closeWindows 3.1 closecloseclosecloseclose0.044 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mosaic 2.0 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NCSA Mosaic 2.0 Windows 3.1desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:15 | by ThaDafinser