User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11) KHTML/4.11.2 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.11 SUSE
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 4.11 KHTML 4.11.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.11closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.11KHTML SUSE desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.11close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.11closeSUSE closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.11close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.11 a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.11KHTML 4.11.2 desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:15 | by ThaDafinser