User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; CUBOT C11 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.57 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/18.0.1290.66961
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
CubotC11 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 18.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 18.0.1290.66961closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 18.0.1290.66961closeAndroid 4.2.2CubotC11mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 18.0Blink Android 4.2CUBOTC11smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 18.0.1290.66961closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 18.0.1290closeAndroid 4.2.2CubotC11closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.10001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 18.0.1290.66961WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 18.0Blink Android 4.2.2CubotC11mobile:smartyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 18.0.1290.66961closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.06901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:15 | by ThaDafinser