User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 6_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mercury/7.4.1 Mobile/10A523 Safari/8536.25
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-520.php
Mercury 7.4iOS 6.0unknown AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mercury 7.4WebKit iOS 6.0AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 8536.25closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 6.0.1AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mercury 7.4WebKit iOS 6.0AppleiPadtabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 6.0.1closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 6.0.1closeiOS 6.0.1AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 6.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.09301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mercury Browser 7.4.1WebKit 536.26iOS 6.0.1AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mercury Browser 7.4.1Webkit 536.26iOS 6.0.1AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile on iOS 34closeiOS 6.0.1AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:14 | by ThaDafinser