User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 3.1; ja-jp; L-06C Build/HMJ37) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/smartphone_android.yaml
Safari 4.0Android 3.1 smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 3.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 3.1LGL-06Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 3.1tabletyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 3.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 3.1closeAndroid 3.1LGL-06Ccloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 3.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.13Android 3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.13Android 3.1LGOptimus Pad L-06Ctabletyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 3.1closeAndroid 3.1LGL-06CTabletyesyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:14 | by ThaDafinser