User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; QNX x86pc; xx; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110316 Namoroka/3.6.15
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-firefox.yaml
Firefox Namoroka 3.6.15QNX Gecko 1.9.2mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.9Gecko 1.9 Desktop0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (Namoroka) 3.6.15closeQNX desktop-browsercloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox Namoroka (3.6Gecko BlackBerry Tablet OS yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox (Namoroka) 3.6.15close closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Namoroka 3.6.15closeQNX closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.9.2.15Gecko 20110316a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Namoroka 3.6.15Gecko 1.9.2QNX mobile:featureyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:14 | by ThaDafinser