User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS x86_64 12.10.0) AppleWebKit/537.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1400.0 Safari/537.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-chromeos.yaml
Chrome Dev 26.0.1400.0Chrome OS Webkit 537.30desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome Blink ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop0.08301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 26.0.1400.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 26.0.1400.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 26.0WebKit Chrome OS 12.10desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 26.0.1400.0closeChrome OS 26.0.1400.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 26.0.1400closeChrome OS 12.10.0closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 26.0.1400.0closeChrome OS 12.10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.11801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 26.0.1400.0WebKit 537.30ChromeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 26.0.1400.0Webkit 537.30Chrome OS desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 26.0.1400.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 26.0.1393.2closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:14 | by ThaDafinser