User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.0; U; xx) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 10.10Windows 2000Presto 2.2.15desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 10.10Presto 2.2Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 10.10closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.10Presto Windows 2000desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.10closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.10closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.10closeWindows 2000 closecloseclosecloseclose0.10501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.10Presto 2.2.15Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 10.10Presto 2.2.15Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 10.00closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:13 | by ThaDafinser