User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; SGP312 Build/10.5.1.A.0.283) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.102 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 38.0Android 4.4unknown SonyXperia Tablet ZTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.4SonyXperia Tablet ZTabletyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.4.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.25302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.4SonyXperia Tablet Ztabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 38.0.2125closeAndroid 4.4.4SonySGP312closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 38Blink Android 4.4.4SonyXperia Tablet Ztabletyescloseclose0.05101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 38closeAndroid 4.4SonySGP312Tabletyesyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:13 | by ThaDafinser