User agent detail

JUC(Linux;U;Android1.6;Zh_cn;LG KH5200;320*480;)UCWEB7.8.0.95/139/352
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGKH5200 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.8WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeAndroid 1.6GenericAndroid 1.6mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.8 Android LGKH5200smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.8.0closeAndroid 1.6LGKH5200closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95closeAndroid 1.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.07901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95 Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.8 Android 1.6LGAndro-1mobile:smartyescloseclose0.042 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 7closeLinux Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:12 | by ThaDafinser