User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0 compatible; Device Mosaic 5.2.2; OpenTV) InettvBrowser/2.3 (008045;PANATV0934;1.32;10000)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/panasonic.yaml
PanasonicOpenTVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident PanasonicSmart TVtv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0close PANATV0934closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MSIE close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.3 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
PanasonicOpenTVtelevisioncloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:12 | by ThaDafinser