User agent detail

Nokia8800a/2.0 (09.45) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia8800a Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia8800a 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries40 Nokia8800 Artemobile-browseryescloseclose0.20802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia8800asmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia8800acloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 8800acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series40 Nokia8800 Artemobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:12 | by ThaDafinser